Prof. Babar Jamil

I hold a PhD in English Language and Literature, with a specialization in modern literary theory. I have over ten years of experience in university-level teaching and research, with a sustained focus on critical theory and its intersections with culture, history, and subjectivity. My scholarly interests extend to philosophy, comparative religion, and psychology, fields that inform and enrich my engagement with literary studies. My work explores how literature and theory interrogate meaning, power, identity, and the limits of language.

Foucault, Nietzsche, and the Question of Power: From Tragic Intuition to Discursive Analysis

Introduction Michel Foucault’s work is often summarised through a single keyword: power. From madness to medicine, from prisons to sexuality, Foucault relentlessly traced the subtle, pervasive, and productive operations of power in modern societies. Yet to read Foucault in isolation is to miss a deeper philosophical lineage that animates his thought. Foucault is not merely […]

Foucault, Nietzsche, and the Question of Power: From Tragic Intuition to Discursive Analysis Read More »

Structuralism vs Poststructuralism: From Presence to Play, From Closure to Openness

Introduction Few debates in twentieth-century literary theory have been as transformative—and as misunderstood—as the shift from structuralism to poststructuralism. Often presented as a neat chronological progression or a simple rejection, this transition is better understood as a profound philosophical reorientation. Structuralism emerged not merely as a method of textual analysis but as a response to

Structuralism vs Poststructuralism: From Presence to Play, From Closure to Openness Read More »

Neoclassicism vs Romanticism: Mind and Heart in Literary History

Introduction: Beyond Period Labels Neoclassicism and Romanticism are typically taught as successive literary movements associated with specific periods in the history of English literature. Neoclassicism is associated with the late 17th and 18th centuries, while Romanticism dominates the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Yet such a chronological understanding, though convenient, is ultimately insufficient. These

Neoclassicism vs Romanticism: Mind and Heart in Literary History Read More »