letsfindtruth12@gmail.com

I hold a PhD in English Language and Literature, with a specialization in modern literary theory. I have over ten years of experience in university-level teaching and research, with a sustained focus on critical theory and its intersections with culture, history, and subjectivity. My scholarly interests extend to philosophy, comparative religion, and psychology, fields that inform and enrich my engagement with literary studies. My work explores how literature and theory interrogate meaning, power, identity, and the limits of language.

Parricide, Superego Cruelty, and Religious Neurosis in

The Brothers Karamazov Few novels stage the psychic drama of paternal authority with the intensity and structural precision of The Brothers Karamazov. If Wuthering Heights dramatizes melancholic incorporation, Dostoevsky’s final novel dramatizes the psychic violence of separation—specifically the separation from the father. The text becomes a laboratory for exploring Oedipal desire, superego formation, guilt without […]

Parricide, Superego Cruelty, and Religious Neurosis in Read More »

Melancholia, Incorporation, and the Death Drive in Wuthering Heights

Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights occupies a singular position in the history of the novel because its psychic architecture appears uncannily aligned with psychoanalytic theory decades before Freud formalized its concepts. The text does not merely depict intense passion; it stages melancholic identification, repetition compulsion, the instability of ego boundaries, and a sustained attraction toward annihilation.

Melancholia, Incorporation, and the Death Drive in Wuthering Heights Read More »

Hamlet and New Historicism

Power, Succession, and the Circulation of Authority in Early Modern England 4 A New Historicist reading of Hamlet rejects the idea that the play exists as autonomous aesthetic object. Instead, it situates the drama within the political, religious, and ideological networks of late sixteenth- and early seventeenth-century England. Meaning emerges not from timeless universality but

Hamlet and New Historicism Read More »

Hamlet and Poststructuralism

Undecidability, Différance, and the Collapse of Stable Meaning 4 A poststructuralist reading of Hamlet begins by unsettling what structuralism attempts to stabilize. If structuralism seeks coherent systems of oppositions, poststructuralism asks: What if those oppositions do not hold? What if meaning is always deferred, fractured, internally contradictory? Drawing from thinkers such as Jacques Derrida, Michel

Hamlet and Poststructuralism Read More »

Hamlet and Structuralism

Binary Oppositions, Narrative Codes, and the Structure of Tragedy A structuralist reading of Hamlet shifts attention away from authorial psychology, historical intention, or moral evaluation. Instead, it asks: What structures generate meaning in the text? How does the play operate as a system of relations? Structuralism, influenced by Saussurean linguistics and later developments in anthropology

Hamlet and Structuralism Read More »

Shakespeare Through Modern Literary Theories

How Contemporary Criticism Rewrites the Bard William Shakespeare survives not because he is timeless in a mystical sense, but because each age reinterprets him. Modern literary theory has repeatedly reshaped Shakespeare, turning his plays into laboratories of power, language, gender, psychology, and ideology. What follows is a structured overview of how major twentieth- and twenty-first-century

Shakespeare Through Modern Literary Theories Read More »

The Six Major Romantic Poets Compared

A Final Synthesis of English Romanticism The six major Romantic poets—William Blake, William Wordsworth, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Lord Byron, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and John Keats—together define English Romanticism. Yet Romanticism is not a single unified doctrine. It evolves across three broad movements: Each poet reshapes the movement according to his temperament and historical moment. I.

The Six Major Romantic Poets Compared Read More »